Having worked in communities big and small across the continent, we’ve had ample opportunity to test ideas and find approaches that work best. Urban design details. Outreach tactics. Implementation tricks. Many of these lessons are transferable, which is why we’ve created “Back of the Envelope,” a weekly feature where we jot ’em down for your consideration.
For those looking to expand public engagement and collaborative process at the community level, this week presents a curious convergence of news and ideas. Setting the stage was CNU20’s “Charrettes and the Next Generation of Public Involvement,” an afternoon breakout session exploring a fairly provocative (for New Urbanists) question: In this era of limited resources, is the traditional charrette still a viable model of engagement and collaborative design and, if not, can it be retooled for relevance?
While founding CNU leaders like Andrés Duany and Gianni Longo debated obstacles and cost efficiencies and PlaceMakers Ben Brown and Hazel Borys drilled down on the politics of getting people to work together, newly elected CNU board member Eliza Harris spoke for the altogether different goals of the Millennial generation (also commonly known as Generation Y) — those born (roughly) between 1982 and 2000.
Not surprisingly, much of what she said involved Millennials’ desire to organize and get hands on with tactical urban initiatives, and the strength of social media to connect, inform and compel action across that demographic. In particular, she touched on the value of Facebook ads, which are highly affordable and can be customized and targeted in almost any way imaginable.
In short, if you’re doing outreach, getting your message in front of Millennials is not a difficult proposition.
At the time, I considered it some pretty solid, straight-from-the-horse’s-mouth advice and it reinforced my already existing belief in social media’s public process potential. But it wasn’t too long before reality once again stepped in, clouding the issue and reminding me that the devil, as always, is in the details.
For example, just a few days later, General Motors announced it was dropping its use of Facebook ads, concluding they had “little or no impact” on the people they were trying to reach. Interesting, for sure, but applicable? I can already hear the completely reasonable urbanist response: This is a company trying to sell $30,000 automobiles to a generation not all that interested in cars. Of course the ads don’t work.
Fair point, so let’s set our sights a little lower. Say, in the $15 commitment range, which brings us to this story on NPR yesterday. Their intent, specifically, was to determine whether or not Facebook ads work, so they did an experiment with a pop-up pizza joint in New Orleans. The results, even after adjusting their targeting midstream? Zilch. Yes, the ad went viral, getting twice the click-throughs of a typical ad. Yes, it showed up on local Facebook pages more than 700,000 times, essentially blanketing the city in both reach and frequency. But despite its stellar performance in all the go-to social media metrics, their $240 investment in the ad yielded a grand total of ten bucks, and that was from a donation. Not a sale.
Millennials, by their own estimation, don’t need a car. But they do need to eat. If getting in front of pretty much every Millennial in town with the promise of a damn tasty pie fails to sell a single pizza — perhaps the most popular youth-oriented munchable of all time — what hope is there for compelling action towards street design, zoning reform or, God forbid, something insufferably dry like a comprehensive plan initiative?
Oh, details. You taunt me so!
But just as it’s misguided to say social media cures everything, it’s equally so to claim it cures nothing. The answer, once again, is in the messy middle ground.
The mistake, especially as it relates to public process, is focusing too much on who you’re reaching and not enough on the particular stories that define them. Ben Brown and I have been talking for some time about communities and their existing stories. Your job, when reaching out to them, is crafting your story entirely in the context of theirs, with an eye towards clarity and simplicity. Find the connecting points, the shared context, the common values. That’s how you compel action.
Maybe young people don’t get passionate about pizza, but they do get passionate about biking. Or transit. Or local food. Or launching an independent business. Or creating more interesting places to gather, mingle and collaborate.
When doing community outreach, that’s your route of greatest potential returns for Facebook ads. You need to slice and dice your audience not just by age and geography but by passion — by story — then tailor each message accordingly.
“Build a better block.” “Make way for biking.” “Join the urban farm initiative.” “Crowdsource Main Street vacancies.”
That’s when Millennials show up. Not because they’ve been made aware of what you’re doing, but because it’s an extension of what they’re doing.
Community planning can be a vehicle for advancing the things that Generation-Y is passionate about. But only if you help them see the connections. Which means it’s not just about getting the word out.
It’s about getting the right word out.
If PlaceShakers is our soapbox, our Facebook page is where we step down, grab a drink and enjoy a little conversation. Looking for a heads-up on the latest community-building news and perspective from around the web? Click through and “Like” us and we’ll keep you in the loop.
3 responses to “Snagging Gen-Y: Do Facebook ads work in public engagement?”
Solid advice Scott. I should note that when I first started harping on Facebook ads (a couple of years ago) it was as an alternative to “Can you expect to be taken seriously” public notices in the back of the newspaper for road projects. Granted that is the lowest common denominator in public engagement, though I certainly think targeted internet advertising has the potential to exceed that low bar by leaps and bounds.
It also depends on the size of the area. The more targeted your desired audience (geographically or otherwise) the easier and less expensive this kind of advertising will be and the easier it is to tailor the message as you recommend (if you say “we’re widening the street 2 blocks from your house” that may get people’s attention more, sadly, than “we’re shaping the future of your city”).
I should also note that it’s not just a way to reach millenials. Older generations don’t read the 2×2 ads in the back of a paper newspaper either. My mom is on Facebook more than I am and definitely more often than she reads a paper newspaper.
Perhaps the difference between millenials and the older generations is that Facebook may be one of the ONLY ways to reach some millennials who don’t read paper anything, attend church in lower numbers, don’t necessarily attend neighborhood association meetings etc etc. And that capturing the attention of Gen Y is essential because they are often the people who will desire what we’re offering and balance public meetings with a future forward perspective.
Great article (once again). As a piece of information and entertainment, here is a link to a funny little animated video I did a while ago that speaks to the issue of communication for Planners that you may enjoy: http://bit.ly/KuIZUR
I think there are good points being made. Who isn’t more likely to pay attention to something that is more directly related to something they do, especially given the way we are bombarded with information (much of it something we want to read but don’t have time to absorb more than a few snippets). As someone who wants to capture the attention of all age groups and hopefully find ways to engage, does anyone have a suggestion on how to brush up on these skills? Creative writing? Public communication classes? Having to do more with less (meaning on my own) I need to really work on the selling of my planning work.